Should We Not Carry Out Special Protection For Key Personnel?

The judiciary should not give special protection to managers, key posts and scientific and technological personnel.

I think this topic involves judicial justice, it is necessary to clarify.

Two years ago, a female nurse was beaten in Nanjing, leading to "paralysis".

Because the batterer and husband are civil servants, the turbulent public opinion has forced the public security organs to take criminal detention in a hurry to hit the person suspected of intentional injury under the condition that the nurse is not in the condition of injury.

After the investigation, the woman nurse was not paralyzed, even minor injuries could not be built.

The public security organ can only withdraw the case and change it into administrative detention.

It seems that this is a hasty arrest case, but in essence it involves judicial justice.

In recent years, there are frequent conflicts between doctors and patients.

When dealing with criminal cases caused by conflicts between doctors and patients, public security and judicial organs often tend to side by side consciously and unconsciously, focusing on combating medical staff.

It ignores the fact that the facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive.

In addition, as the batterer has the civil servant status, the "hatred and official" sentiment on the Internet is high.

This is not a refuge for the batterer, but an objective and fair legal principle.

Quote the old case just to illustrate.

The concept of justice is important.

Our Constitution stipulates that "citizens of People's Republic of China are equal before the law."

Fair justice and equal treatment of every citizen and litigant is one of the most important legal principles.

The legitimate rights and interests of medical personnel must be protected, and the legitimate rights and interests of patients must also be protected.

Similarly, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, business managers and enterprise workers, officials and civilians, every citizen and legal person are equal before the law, and they should be protected by law.

It is against the rule of justice to discriminate against others.

。

Of course, in judicial practice, according to the change of criminal offense, it is necessary to strike a certain category of criminal activities for a period of time and focus on protecting a certain group of people.

But this is only the adjustment of the work strategy. The shift of the key point of work should not and should not affect the change of the concept of law enforcement.

Focusing on this category of crime does not mean a broad tolerance for other criminal activities.

Focusing on protecting this group of people does not mean neglecting other people.

The seriousness demands that the judiciary maintain the continuity, unification and balance of the judiciary.

When the time is heavy, the time is light and the time is tight.

It is precisely this kind of "exercise law enforcement" that has led to the phenomenon of "avoiding the wind" and led to many criminal activities being banned for a long time.

We are in an open Internet era, facing a diverse network of public opinion.

Every citizen commenting on every news incident and criminal case from different angles. This is beyond reproach.

As a judiciary, we must uphold a fair and just stand and judge and punish according to the law and facts.

Only if every judicial officer keeps in mind and practices the principle of "equality before the law", our credibility in the judiciary will become stronger and more durable.