The Label And Actual Disagreement Of Clothing Tag Are 3 Times Compensated By Consumers.

Spend more than 1000 yuan to buy clothes, said good nylon content of 100%, but actually mixed with moisture, which let consumers Liu is very hurt.

In a rage, Liu went to court to demand compensation.

Recently, Sichuan Suining boat hill court has sentenced such a case of consumer and shopping disputes, and ultimately the merchants were found to have consumer fraud. They were sentenced to 3 times the original price to compensate consumers, while the cost of inspection was 210 yuan.

In October 1, 2018, Chongqing Chongqing Liu bought a women's coat at the new century department store (Suining Xindu store), which cost 1328 yuan.

The logo of the coat is 100% of the nylon content. Liu suspects it and thinks that there is more than one ingredient in it.

Liu actually sent the clothes to his testing. A few days later, the report showed that the amount of nylon fabric purchased by Liu was 80% and the polyester fiber was 20%.

That is to say, it is a mixture of a variety of fiber components.

After many trips to the mall to find out the other party's failure to negotiate, Liu went to court on a huff, asking for 3 times the cost of compensation and taking up the inspection fee.

The boat hill court accepted the case.

After the trial, the district court held that the defendant, Suining Xindu, a new century department store, was responsible for the quality of its products sold as an operator.

The nylon content purchased by the plaintiff does not conform to the actual test result, and is judged to be unqualified. The operator's behavior constitutes a consumer fraud.

Finally, the court decided that the Chongqing new century department store chain store Co., Ltd., Suining Xindu, compensated Liu Yuan for a loss of 4194 yuan, including the inspection fee.

Does the identity quality of the merchandise sold by the operator inconsistent with the actual test result constitute a consumer fraud?

President Deng Yi, who is responsible for hearing the case, explained that the nylon content of the clothing material sold by the defendant's new century department store Suining company was 100% and 80% of the test result, which was a fraud and should bear civil liability.

"If consumers buy the tag on clothing, if it is identified as a mixed fiber, it is legally allowed to float to a certain extent. If the label is a single component, it must be strictly observed."